Medeo AI Test Report Does Integrated Multimodal Technology Truly Offer Any Value

If you've ever used AI video tools, you're probably familiar with their production process. Image generation, script writing, voiceover, subtitles, and background music – these steps can almost all be completed individually using AI tools. However, the real problem is that these functions are often scattered across different tools, lacking seamless integration.

That's why, when I first saw Medeo AI touting "integrated multimodal video generation," I wasn't particularly excited; instead, I was more skeptical: did it simply bundle these functions together, or could it truly integrate the entire process?

With this question in mind, I conducted a relatively comprehensive test of Medeo AI.

 

Integrated multimodal systems are not simply a matter of "stacking functions."

Medeo AI's product positioning is straightforward and very similar to that of other video editing programs like Camtasia. Their aim is to provide an all-in-one solution for anyone with an idea for a video. The goal is for users with no experience making videos to be able to create an entire video from start to finish using Medeo AI, without having to use multiple applications.

Medeo AI aims to eliminate any need for users to switch between different applications. Users of Medeo AI do not have to have extensive knowledge and experience in video editing or post-production in order to be successful in creating their first video. For those with little experience using video editing tools, the combined capabilities of Medeo AI will provide a huge advantage in overcoming the learning curve.

Another major advantage of Medeo AI is that the creation of a video is not a “one and done” type of tool. After creating a video, users can access their project files, giving them the ability to edit and make changes to their finished product as many times as they would like.

Controllability: It Is Not A Completely Closed Black Box.

In actual use, what I care about most isn't whether it can generate videos, but rather the extent to which the generated videos can be modified.

Based on my current experience, Medeo AI maintains a certain level of control. Every frame in the video can be replaced; you can either regenerate AI images or directly upload local materials for replacement. At the same time, each frame corresponds to an independent audio script, meaning the narration isn't bound to the entire video but can be fine-tuned according to specific frames.

In terms of audio and presentation, users can also make basic adjustments to the voiceover, subtitle style, and background music. While these editing capabilities aren't professional-grade, they at least ensure that the generated video isn't a passive, unchangeable result, but rather content that can be further refined and corrected.

Furthermore, Medeo AI also supports automatically parsing content and generating videos via files or URLs, which can save a considerable amount of time when creating presentations, tutorials, or informational content.

What are the actual generation results like? Three sets of real-world tests with different types of data.

To more objectively assess the capabilities and limitations of Medeo AI, I didn't test just one type of content. Instead, I conducted three sets of tests focusing on different aspects, including style, complexity, and real-world usage scenarios.

Test 1: Illustrated educational short film (8/10)

For the first test, I chose a relatively lightweight scenario, asking Medeo AI to generate an illustrated educational short video on the topic of "How common intelligent transportation systems in cities work."

The entire generation process was quite smooth. Medeo AI not only automatically created a clear explanatory script but also reasonably divided the visual structure, ensuring that each segment of content had a corresponding visual representation. The illustration style maintained good consistency across different scenes, and the voiceover rhythm matched the content explanation, resulting in a smooth overall viewing experience.

Of course, it wasn't without its flaws. The details in some frames were slightly simplified, and some transitions were a bit abrupt, but overall, this did not affect the information delivery. From the perspective of "usability of the final product," this was a very well-executed generation experience.

Test 2: Short documentary of realistic everyday life scenes (6.5 / 10)

In the second set of tests, I focused on content closer to real-world scenarios, attempting to generate a short video in a documentary style, featuring a middle-aged man walking in the city in the morning.

In terms of image quality, Medeo AI's performance is still commendable. The character modeling is realistic, the environmental details are rich, and the streets, buildings, and lighting changes are handled quite naturally. Each individual segment has a good visual quality.

However, problems also emerged. As the video progresses, there are noticeable inconsistencies in the character across different shots; clothing, physical details, and even age characteristics change, and the temporal and spatial relationships between scenes are not clear enough. This breaks down the intended continuous documentary narrative into a series of relatively independent segments.

Test 3: Multi-scene narrative short film (5/10)

In the third set of tests, I deliberately increased the difficulty, designing a narrative short film containing multiple scenes and emotional shifts, involving the psychological changes of the characters at different points in time and changes in their environment.

In this test, Medeo AI still showed strengths in the visual presentation of individual shots. The composition and atmosphere rendering of some scenes were excellent, and the emotional tone of the narration generally matched the visual style.

However, overall, the video felt more like a combination of several independent segments rather than a complete, unfolding story. The characters' states lacked continuity across different scenes, and the narrative rhythm failed to create a clear ebb and flow. This further confirmed its lack of unified control capabilities when handling long narratives and complex structures.

Overall assessment: The direction is correct, but it is still in the early stages.

Medeo AI is not a product that can be classified as highly innovative based solely upon its theoretical framework, though it does successfully bring together various creative aspects of video production onto one single platform and place an emphasis on removing potential barriers for those wishing to create their first video.

The downsides of using Medeo AI are just as evident as its advantages. The inconsistency between different frames and the difficulty in directing complex story lines make the software more appropriate for short, simple, and/or structured videos than longer pieces of work.

If you're looking for more stable output?

After comparing different options, if your goal is greater consistency, stronger model control, and more professional-grade image and video quality, then a platform like Viddo AI, which supports multi-model switching and focuses on output stability, would be a relatively safe choice.

In Conclusion

Essentially, Medeo AI serves as a means to expedite the process of turning concepts into moving images, but does not provide an end-to-end answer for replacing traditional video-making methods.

Medeo AI is a great option for new users or content producers who wish to explore various concepts for their own use independently, or if you are seeking to test a project idea quickly without having the experience or knowledge needed to create a high-quality production. That being said, if you are expecting high levels of image quality; for story and images being coherent with one another; in terms of quality; then you may want to look for a more in-depth solution(s) to aid in these aspects at this time.